AICE Media Studies AS- Cabezas, L

  Scrapped clips and replacements With all the peer review received in the past, I decided it was for the better that I get rid of all old clips and all old content from the previous draft, and instead start a whole new project. I have first set up the sound and effects side of my film, by adding any sound effects or cuts I want on a template. Next, it was time for me to record again new clips. I decided to work out on board how I want the film to develop, and thus recorded four different clips. Focusing on ground level shots, medium/low level shots, and one point of view shot. The camera movement of one of these clips was steady, but the remaining clips remained a natural camera movement as I had no resources or well-elevated structures to maintain my camera in a good position to record both the environment and me adequately. I took multiple clips for all four clips, edited those clips so they're shorter and cut out any errors, and then continued to adjust them on Premiere Pro so ...

  Peer Reviewing On a final edit, a week after I received thoughts regarding my film. I was told that I should look back into these details, which I will use to improvise on my film as much as I can. I was told things by my peers such as: - Time: I was told that it was too long, and the text was hard to keep up with, so I will also have to look into this. - How things are presented (lore/context/plot): it was difficult for viewers to fully grasp what was occurring, so I was told to revise this and try to make it more clear to understand. - Revision of events: the way the film plays. Instead of having simple scenes, I could have other things such as Newspaper Headlines or other films that don't have just me. Outside of this, I received positive reviews on things such as sound and music, but overall I feel like I did worse than better, I will be trying my best to address these points.